We could! The technology for cloning does exist. It’s just about recovering sufficient, viable tissue to use. Unfortunately cells and tissue cannot stay alive for millions of years so we don’t have anything to work with. Fossils are hard and don’t contain any tissue. Shame.
Because unlike in Jurassic park we haven’t found a sample of DNA complete enough to be able to do the cloning. Though if we did find such a sample I think we could notionally be able to do it with the technology we have, we’d have to be careful about which animals we used as surrogate mothers for any cloned dinosaur.
Cloning hasn’t got to this sci-fi level yet, but it probably could. problem is, the scientists in jurassic park used frog DNA to repair the sample they had from the mosquito. The resulting ‘dinosaur’ would therefore be a little bit ‘frog’.
I’d have a diplodocus and a brontosaurus and keep them in a big park. In fact I’d have a lot more than one, so they could have babies.
Cloning a dinosaur isn’t impossible. But it is very unlikely we’ll ever be able to do it.
The main reason is that DNA doesn’t last forever. So the chances of finding any in good condition from an animal that died 65 million years ago are pretty slim.
Comments
sammehftw commented on :
But i thought the DNA was found in the blood samples in the mosquitos. Not fossils.
powerpork commented on :
aaarrrrgggghhhh imagine having a pet dinosaurs
stabbytheduck commented on :
i know :'( shame
hannahupton commented on :
haha pet dinosuarss :s
hannahupton commented on :
Why does it say this above my questionn ?.
Thank you for your comment. It is currently in the queue for one of the very hard-working moderators to approve
Moderator - Nazma commented on :
Because we have to check you comment and approve it before it appears on here. Oh and we are very very hard-working! 😀
ugal commented on :
how many very very hard-working moderators are there your so fast at your jobs well done! 🙂
madmaddz commented on :
this was posted on my sisters birthday 🙂